This demonstrates, I think, that the crisis on the left is as old as the left. The left is not perfect. The left has often supported dodgy regimes. The left has often been guilty of naivety and has always been divided against itself. This is not, of course, of itself a vindication of the left - not being as bad as the days of the Jacobin Terror is hardly a glowing encomium. Still, the notion that the left went bad in 2003 when Noam Chomsky and George Galloway signed up is, perhaps, a tad unhistorical.*
So, the charge sheet against the left. Firstly the left has made common cause with fascism.
This is set out by Nick Cohen in 'What's Left':
On 15 February 2003 , about a million liberal-minded people marched through London to oppose the overthrow of a fascist regime. It was the biggest protest in British history, but it was dwarfed by the march to oppose the overthrow of a fascist regime in Mussolini’s old capital of Rome, where about three million Italians joined what the Guinness Book of Records said was the largest anti-war rally ever. In Madrid, about 650,000 marched to oppose the overthrow of a fascist regime in the biggest demonstration in Spain since the death of General Franco in 1975. In Berlin, the call to oppose the overthrow of a fascist regime brought demonstrators from 300 German towns and cities, some of them old enough to remember when Adolf Hitler ruled from the Reich Chancellery […] On a memorable day, American scientists at the McMurdo Station in Antarctica produced another entry for the record books. Historians will tell how the continent’s first political demonstration was a protest against the overthrow of a fascist regime.
(Via: it seems to have vanished from the Observer website)
I think most of the other items on the charge sheet are rather more substantive. I thought I would get this one out of the way as it is trivial and dishonest. Imagine a court case where the police essentially cook up the evidence against someone who they have good reason, but no solid evidence, to believe is a criminal. The judge throws it out. Is the judge a defender of criminality or, possibly, might it be the case that the ends do not justify the means, particularly if the ends are uncertain (the police might be wrong). In the same way one could deplore Saddam's regime without being convinced of the case for the Iraq war. Used universally Cohen's worst case style could be cast in other directions. It can be quite accurately claimed that in September 1939 the British government went to war in defence of an anti-Semitic dictatorship which had gladly acquiesced in the dismemberment of Czechoslovakia but it would be misleading to do so.
Next up (when I get round to it): Is the left anti-Semitic?
No comments:
Post a Comment